Readiness
earned weight ÷ conclusive weight
Pass earns full weight. Warning earns half. Fail earns none. Unable to verify is excluded rather than treated as failure.
Transparent by design
AXplore runs deterministic checks against public website signals. No language model decides whether a check passes, and the same evidence always produces the same score.
Scoring model
Readiness describes verified performance. Coverage tells you how much of the applicable assessment was actually verified.
earned weight ÷ conclusive weight
Pass earns full weight. Warning earns half. Fail earns none. Unable to verify is excluded rather than treated as failure.
conclusive weight ÷ applicable weight
Coverage falls whenever evidence cannot be verified. A high readiness score with low coverage is an early signal, not a verdict.
Result states
The required evidence was found.
Evidence exists, but is incomplete or malformed.
The check conclusively found a barrier.
The optional interface does not apply and has no score impact.
Evidence could not be retrieved; coverage falls, not readiness.
Deterministic assessment
Each check has a fixed weight, a specific evidence source and an explicit limit. Optional interfaces never penalise sites that do not use them.
Can an agent locate the site, its public map and its preferred identity?
Can an agent extract useful content and machine-readable facts from the homepage?
Does the site declare access rules or optional interfaces that agents can use?
Validation
Saved real responses and hand-authored edge cases must produce their expected results. A disagreement fails the test suite.
Identical evidence produces identical scores, and no single check can move overall readiness by more than 15 points.
The first 20-site study found a moderate positive relationship with task success (r = 0.43). That is not enough evidence to claim prediction.
See the method in practice